What is the curiosity? What inspires landscapes? What thinking produces landslides? What challenges familiar? And again: what has the curiosity to do with philosophy? The Latins, as reveals the etymology of the word, have guessed the close relationship between curiosity and attention . The curious thing is the one who care, who cares. Michel Foucault's thought and lived as a curiosity perennial philosophical exercise. A curiosity that has inspired not only his work but that is overflowing in a flood of papers, articles, controversy, interviews replicated in part by the publisher Marietti: an exercise in "philosophical journalism", as defined by the French philosopher. An "exercise", which encompasses a wide series: the birth of the prison to the processes of medicalization, the question of the subject to regimes of truth.
But as you practice the curiosity? "Curiosity - wrote Foucault - evokes the" cure "the attention it pays to what exists or could exist." The real and the possible, therefore, the two registers on which the philosopher "plays" his curiosity. In this cross-reference between the real and the possible lies underneath, as a core, the full extent to which Foucault's philosophical discourse. thought worth practicing is not what it "seeks to assimilate what they should know, but what you lose their certainties." The curiosity that the soul "is immobilized before the real", but tries to "get rid of what is familiar," practicing "to look at things differently." The thought then he has to do with the predicament, with the ability to shift, exposing the family all'inusitato, to worry. For Foucault, "knowledge is not made for comfort: it disappoints, it makes us restless, carving, hurts. " A thought which does not remain alienated from reality. As noted by Mauro Bertani, in postafazione of "Discipline, Powers, Truth, for Foucault" thoughts, ideas, speeches have a material force. " The thought does not belong to a meta-plan, nor is detached existence: indeed invade, permeates, the stylized. This is why the French philosopher has spoken of his books and his research as "fragments of autobiography."
Who - as in the controversy with the organic intellectuals of the Communist Party - scolded him to have built, through his research on madness and the birth of the prison, a sort of metaphysical power, a vision in which power comes to cover and overwhelm the entire real, the French philosopher opposing an insurgency made up of a web of strategies and struggles: "What I want do is make an interpretation, a reading of a real, such that, on the one hand, this interpretation can produce effects of truth and, secondly, the effects of these truths can become tools in the context of struggle possible. To say the truth because it is attacked. Deciphering a layer of reality so that they reveal the lines of strength and fragility, with the points of resistance and possible points of attack, roads and paths already traced that intersect. What I try to bring up is a reality of fighting as possible. " power - in the conception of Foucault - is a field of forces and relations of forces, always reversible, furniture, open. Where there is power there is resistance, and therefore can make the change, to act on new records, unpublished reports to activate and open up new struggles. A journey that will take place at the heart of Foucault's philosophical discourse, the practice of freedom.
A reconstruction of the constellation of Foucault's thought (his articulations of his "travel theory ", his thoughts, his aporia) is offered by Vincenzo Sorrentino it The Political Thought of Foucault. The power, the interplay between knowledge and power, the disciplines, genealogy, self-care, asceticism, the stylization of existence, the subject and the techniques of subjectification: a thought that after more than twenty years after death of the philosopher does not stop to fascinate and disturb. Sorrentino locates the "heart" of Foucault's discourse - which somehow led his whole route - and that inherits from the French philosopher Nietzsche: "The general principle of Foucault is as follows: each form is a compound of the balance of power "(Deleuze). There is a substance, a foundation, a fund. There is an origin nor a destination. "The theoretical space within which research moves of the French philosopher - Sorrentino writes - is, first, the critically nietzcheana of the subject and the related concept of living as a" complex configuration "and reality as a network in which" everything is linked and conditional ".
The conception of reality as a field of struggle, a bundle of relationships always reversible - "the real controversy," writes Foucault - is not a denial of freedom, but its exaltation. Does not result in a narrowing of ethics, but in its stylization. But what freedom? Sorrentino shows the oscillations that the practice of semantic freedom suffers in Foucault, freedom on the one hand conceived "as freedom of 'individual to establish itself as a creative principle itself. Yet, on the other hand, it is also conceived as freedom from itself, loss of self, out of themselves. The result is a concept at the same time, autopoietic and ecstatic individual. "
Freedom and Ethics: A does not exist without the other, is a condition of the other. "Freedom - wrote Foucault - is the ontological condition of ethics. But ethics is reflected in the form that freedom takes. "
Michel Foucault, Discipline, Powers, Truth, Marietti
Vincenzo Sorrentino, The Political Thought of Foucault, Meltemi
(Bombacarta-2008)